MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022324660 · doi:10.5539/jas.v3n1p271

Study on the Influential Factors of Employment for the Economic Management College Students in Agricultural University under Financial Crisis Background

2011· article· en· W2022324660 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hong Pan, Renhui He

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Methods and Teacher Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSWOT analysisAgricultureFeelingCompetition (biology)Work (physics)Financial crisisBusinessEconomic growthManagementPublic relationsPolitical scienceMarketingEconomicsPsychologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At present, there are some typical problems in economic management college agricultural universityundergraduates' profession decision-making, such as taking up an occupation passively, not feeling satisfied withcurrent work and so on. Aiming at these phenomena and based on the background of the financial crisis, in thepaper, the author analyzed the cause from the angle of the graduates and carried through the SWOT analysis ofemployment competition. The results indicate that agricultural universities should strengthen the development ofperson with ability that could accord with the demand of social economic, strengthen education linked to thetheory and practice of education, strengthen its employment training capacity and improving the competitivenessof employment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicEducational Methods and Teacher DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207