MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022337244 · doi:10.1115/1.1505626

Hamiltonian Mechanics for Functionals Involving Second-Order Derivatives

2002· article· en· W2022337244 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Mechanics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Differential Geometry Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsHamiltonian (control theory)Equations of motionCalculus of variationsAnalytical mechanicsOrdinary differential equationHamiltonian mechanicsHamilton–Jacobi equationDifferential equationVariational principleHamilton's principleClassical mechanicsAnalytical dynamicsPartial differential equationMathematical analysisPhysicsQuantum mechanicsMathematical optimizationPhase space

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hamilton’s principle was developed for the modeling of dynamic systems in which time is the principal independent variable and the resulting equations of motion are second-order differential equations. This principle uses kinetic energy which is functionally dependent on first-order time derivatives, and potential energy, and has been extended to include virtual work. In this paper, a variant of Hamiltonian mechanics for systems whose motion is governed by fourth-order differential equations is developed and is illustrated by an example invoking the flexural analysis of beams. The variational formulations previously associated with Newton’s second-order equations of motion have been generalized to encompass problems governed by energy functionals involving second-order derivatives. The canonical equations associated with functionals with second order derivatives emerge as four first-order equations in each variable. The transformations of these equations to a new system wherein the generalized variables and momenta appear as constants, can be obtained through several different forms of generating functions. The generating functions are obtained as solutions of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation. This theory is illustrated by application to an example from beam theory the solution recovered using a technique for solving nonseparable forms of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation. Finally whereas classical variational mechanics uses time as the primary independent variable, here the theory is extended to include static mechanics problems in which the primary independent variable is spatial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it