Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogues administered by a continuous release system produce a more complete and constant inhibition of the pituitary-ovarian axis than do multiple, daily intranasal insufflations or a once daily subcutaneous injection. In the present study, results were too limited to make a valid comparison between the clinical efficacy of various formulations in the treatment of endometriosis. A slow-release formulation is more effective in inducing amenorrhoea, but also produces more frequent and more severe clinical symptoms of oestrogen deprivation. There is no significant change in serum cholesterol levels during 6 months of treatment with any of the formulations used. During LHRH analogue treatment, the increase in urinary excretion of calcium is related to the rate and degree of serum oestradiol inhibition but the loss in bone mineral content is small and reversible after cessation of treatment. Both short-term and long-term treatment with LHRH analogues is feasible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it