Investigation of bond between fibre-reinforced polymer bars and concrete under sustained loads
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although the use of fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars to replace steel in reinforced concrete is becoming more common, uncertainty remains concerning the long-term performance of FRP, including the effect of a sustained load on the bond between the FRP bars and the concrete. An experimental study was therefore undertaken to investigate the long-term durability of the bond for various types of bars embedded in concrete: one type of glass FRP, two types of carbon FRP, and conventional steel reinforcing bars. Pullout specimens were tested both statically to failure and under sustained loads for periods of up to 1 year while free-end slip was monitored. Results revealed lower short-term bond strengths for FRP bars relative to steel and significant variability in long-term bond-slip performance among FRP bars of different types. Post-testing investigations revealed damage to bar surfaces at the macroscopic level, as well as broken longitudinal fibres and damage to the surface coatings at the microscopic level.Key words: reinforced concrete, fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP), bond, creep, pullout, sustained loads.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".