Basaloid carcinoma of the colon arising at the splenic flexure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Basaloid carcinomas typically arise in the anal canal and there are only three well-documented cases of this neoplasm reported outside the anal canal, none more proximally than the sigmoid colon. The first occurrence of a basaloid colonic carcinoma arising outside the sigmoid colon, at the splenic flexure, is presented. METHODS AND RESULTS: A splenic flexure mass was resected from a 54-year-old man with a 3-week history of abdominal discomfort, diarrhoea and weight loss. This tumour, like typical anal canal basaloid carcinomas, was composed of islands of basaloid cells with peripheral nuclear palisading; within many islands there was central necrosis and focal squamous differentiation. Ultrastructural and immunohistochemical studies confirmed the basaloid nature and focal squamous differentiation within this neoplasm. Basaloid carcinoma of the anal canal has been associated with human papilloma virus. Using in-situ hybridization, HPV DNA was not detected in this case. CONCLUSIONS: Outside the anal canal, it has been postulated that basaloid colonic carcinomas may arise from cloacogenic embryologic rests, squamous metaplastic epithelium, or totipotential basal cells. The location and pathological findings of this tumour suggest that this rare colonic neoplasm arises from a totipotential basal cell.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".