MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022405015 · doi:10.1080/15326349.2012.672141

On Some Properties of Bivariate Exponential Distributions

2012· article· en· W2022405015 on OpenAlexaff
Qi‐Ming He, Hanqin Zhang, Juan C. Vera

Bibliographic record

VenueStochastic Models · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbability and Risk Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsBivariate analysisMajorizationExponential functionNatural exponential familyStochastic orderingApplied mathematicsExponential formulaCombinatoricsStatisticsMathematical analysisDouble exponential function

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We show that the two bivariate exponential distributions constructed in Bladt and Nielsen[ 5 Bladt , M. ; Nielsen , B.F. On the construction of bivariate exponential distributions with an arbitrary correlation coefficient . Stochastic Models 2010 , 26 ( 2 ), 295 – 308 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar] ] have the maximum and minimum correlation coefficients for any given order. We also generalize their constructions to the case where the matrix representations of the two (marginal) exponential distributions have different orders and show that the new constructions also have the maximum and minimum correlation coefficients. Our main tool is a majorization result for a special set of PH-generators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.209
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.137 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStochastic ModelsSame topicProbability and Risk ModelsFrench-language works237,207