MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022442134 · doi:10.3198/jpr2008.08.0465crg

Registration of Spring Wheat Germplasm TC 67 Resistant to Fusarium Head Blight

2009· article· en· W2022442134 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Plant Registrations · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFusariumBiologyGermplasmAgronomyPopulationGrain yieldCultivarInoculationHorticultureDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TC 67 red spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) (Reg. No. GP‐856, PI 654367) was developed at the Cereal and Oilseed Research Center, Agriculture and Agri‐Food Canada. TC 67 was derived from the cross Crocus*2/PI343447 ( T. timopheevii Zhuk). A segregating population of 1500 BC 1 F 2 plants was established and advanced to F 7 , using single seed descent. One hundred lines were selected from 535 BC 1 F 7 lines, on the basis of plant fertility and agronomic traits, and evaluated for reaction to Fusarium head blight (FHB; caused by Fusarium graminearum ) for two seasons. TC 67 had high levels of resistance to FHB that was comparable to that of ‘Sumai 3’, the most FHB resistant wheat available, based on point inoculation. The resistance of TC 67 to FHB was further evaluated in replicated field trials, compared with two resistant wheat lines, Sumai 3 and ‘HY 644’, in a FHB disease nursery in 2003 and 2004. The results show that TC 67 was significantly better than HY 644 in FHB incidence, severity, and Fusarium‐damaged kernels and was comparable to Sumai 3 in deoxynivalenol content in the grain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.859
Threshold uncertainty score0.196

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it