Intestinal Lipoprotein Production Is Stimulated by an Acute Elevation of Plasma Free Fatty Acids in the Fasting State: Studies in Insulin-Resistant and Insulin-Sensitized Syrian Golden Hamsters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is not known whether intestinal lipoprotein production is stimulated by an acute elevation of plasma free fatty acids (FFA). We examined the effect of an intralipid and heparin infusion on the intestinal lipoprotein production rate (PR) in insulin-sensitive [chow-fed (CHOW)], insulin-resistant [60% fructose (FRUC) or 60% fat-fed (FAT)], and insulin-sensitized [FRUC or FAT plus rosiglitazone (RSG)-treated] Syrian Golden hamsters. After 5 wk of treatment, overnight-fasted hamsters underwent in vivo Triton WR-1339 studies for measurement of apolipoprotein B48 (apoB48) PR in large (Svedberg unit, >400) and small (Svedberg unit, 100-400) lipoprotein fractions, with an antecedent 90-min infusion of 20% intralipid and heparin (IH) to raise plasma FFA levels approximately 5- to 8-fold vs. those in the saline control study. IH markedly increased apoB48 PR in CHOW by 3- to 5-fold, which was confirmed ex vivo in pulse-chase experiments in primary cultured hamster enterocytes. Oleate, but not glycerol, infusion was associated with a similar elevation of apoB48 PR as IH. In FRUC and FAT, basal (saline control) apoB48 PR was approximately 4-fold greater than that in CHOW; there was no additional stimulation with IH in vivo and only minimal additional stimulation ex vivo. RSG partially normalized basal apoB48 PR in FAT and FRUC, and PR was markedly stimulated with IH. We conclude that intestinal lipoprotein production is markedly stimulated by an acute elevation of plasma FFAs in insulin-sensitive hamsters, in which basal production is low, but minimally in insulin-resistant hamsters, in which basal production is already elevated. With RSG treatment, basal PR is partially normalized, and they become more susceptible to the acute FFA stimulatory effect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".