MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022471172 · doi:10.1520/gtj11291j

Steady State Strength of Sands in a Constant Volume Ring Shear Apparatus

2002· article· en· W2022471172 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeotechnical Testing Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeotechnical engineeringMaterials scienceLiquefactionVolume (thermodynamics)RepeatabilityConstant (computer programming)Shear (geology)Direct shear testSaturation (graph theory)Soil liquefactionSteady state (chemistry)Composite materialMechanicsGeologyChemistryThermodynamicsChromatographyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A modified volume ring shear test apparatus has been developed to undertake constant volume ring shear tests on sand. This constant volume test is a useful means of assessing the steady state strength of granular soils at large strain to determine the liquefaction potential of a soil mass. The apparatus and specimen preparation tools and methods are presented herein. The paper also presents the device and method used to verify the uniformity of the specimens prepared and the repeatability of the specimen preparation method. An experimental program has been conducted using both constant volume (CV) and constant load (CL) tests to investigate the effect of saturation, and of fines on the steady state line (SSL) and the steady state strength (SSS) envelope.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it