Adaptive gradual plastic hinge model for nonlinear analysis of steel frameworks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a new refined plastic hinge method for nonlinear analysis of steel frameworks. The unique feature of the method is a newly developed adaptive plastic hinge model that is capable of modeling the degradation of stiffness of a steel frame member due to the spread of plasticity both through the section depth and along the member length. Subsequently, it has been identified that there are two key parameters in the modeling. The first involves mimicking the spread of plasticity through a section depth, while the second incorporates the spread of plasticity along a member length. Procedures to determine the key parameters are then developed using moment–curvature–thrust relationship for beam-columns. The proposed analysis method is perceived to be especially advantageous when the spread of plasticity along a member length is modeled using various discretization schemes. Two numerical examples are performed to demonstrate the accuracy and simplicity of the method. Key words: steel frames, plasticity, second-order analysis, plastic hinge, beam-columns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it