Consequences of thyroxine treatment on diaphragm and EDL of normal and dystrophic hamsters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previously administration of thyroxine (T4) to dystrophic hamsters improved ventilation and slowed the progression of the disease. We hypothesized that the normalization of ventilation in these animals was due to T4 improving structural and functional characteristics of the diaphragm. In the present study, contractile characteristics of the diaphragm and the extensor digitorum longus (EDL) from normal and dystrophic hamsters were evaluated after two months of T4 treatment. Compared to their placebo-treated counterparts, diaphragms and EDLs of T4-treated normal hamsters showed increased optimal muscle lengths and twitch tension, decreased contraction times and increased fatigability. T4-treatment in dystrophic hamsters showed only an increase in diaphragmatic twitch tension development. Force-frequency curves before treatment were generally higher for the normal compared to dystrophic diaphragms and EDLs. T4 administration only increased the force in normal diaphragms at the lower frequencies and in the EDLs at the higher frequencies. Although T4 serum levels were increased in both T4-treated groups, triiodothyronine (T3) was much lower in the dystrophic compared to normal hamsters, suggesting that conversion of T4 to T3 was reduced in dystrophic hamsters. We conclude that the limited functional changes in the diaphragms of T4-treated dystrophic hamsters cannot account for the marked improvement in ventilation previously reported.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".