Intratympanic Gentamicin for Intractable Meniere's Disease: 5-Year Follow-up
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and morbidity of intratympanic gentamicin titration therapy on patients with incapacitating unilateral Meniere's disease. METHOD: The study consisted of a retrospective chart review and patient interviews. Sixty-eight patients had been followed for a minimum of 24 months and were reported on in an earlier study. Forty-six of these individuals were available for detailed follow-up at 5 years post-gentamicin therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Vertigo frequency, hearing status, personal disability ratings, and tinnitus level before and after gentamicin therapy were measured. RESULTS: Seventy-four percent of patients showed complete vertigo control and an additional 7% showed substantial vertigo control. There was also significant improvement in personal ratings of social and economic functioning. Overall, the group showed no combined statistically significant changes in any of the hearing parameters. CONCLUSION: Intratympanic gentamicin titration therapy provides excellent vertigo control, with a similarly significant improvement in both personal and occupational functioning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".