The Performance of Air-Air Ejectors With Triangular Tabbed Driving Nozzles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes an experimental investigation into the effects of geometrical variations on ejector system performance when the driving nozzle includes delta mixing tabs. Mixing tabs have been shown to provide good mixing performance with comparable back-pressure penalties to other types of enhanced mixing nozzles. The performance parameters of most interest are pumping, mixing, and back-pressure. Geometric parameters studied include standoff distance, mixing-tube diameter, and tab angle. Experimental testing showed significant performance improvements in mixing and pumping with a decrease in tab angle. Maximum mixing was found to occur with tab angles positioned at 120°. Exceptional mixing was also observed with increased standoff. Back-pressure was shown to increase with increasing standoff and decreasing tab angle, but was not affected by mixing-tube diameter. In addition, a zone of recirculation was identified at the entrance to the mixing-tube. This zone is thought to have an influence on ejector performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it