MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022564991 · doi:10.1021/bi020078n

A Case for Reverse Protonation:  Identification of Glu160 as an Acid/Base Catalyst in <i>Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum</i> β-Xylosidase and Detailed Kinetic Analysis of a Site-Directed Mutant

2002· article· en· W2022564991 on OpenAlexaff
David J. Vocadlo, Jacqueline Wicki, Karen Rupitz, Stephen G. Withers

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnzyme Production and Characterization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryEnzyme kineticsActive siteStereochemistryEnzymeElectrospray ionizationBiochemistryChromatographyMass spectrometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The catalytic mechanism of the family 39 Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum beta-xylosidase (XynB) involves a two-step double-displacement mechanism in which a covalent alpha-xylosyl-enzyme intermediate is formed with assistance from a general acid and then hydrolyzed with assistance from a general base. Incubation of recombinant XynB with the newly synthesized active site-directed inhibitor, N-bromoacetyl-beta-D-xylopyranosylamine, resulted in rapid, time-dependent inactivation of the enzyme (k(i)/K(i) = 4.3 x 10(-4) s(-1)mM(- 1)). Protection from inactivation using xylose or benzyl 1-thio-beta-xyloside suggested that the inactivation was active site-directed. Mass spectrometric analysis indicated that incubation of the enzyme with the inactivator resulted in the stoichiometric formation of a new enzyme species bearing the label. Comparative mapping of peptic digests of both the labeled and unlabeled enzyme by HPLC coupled to an electrospray ionization mass spectrometer permitted the identification of a labeled peptide. Sequencing of this peptide by tandem mass spectrometry identified Glu160 within the sequence (157)IWNEPNL(164) as the site of attachment of the N-acetyl-beta-D-xylopyranosylamine moiety. Kinetic analysis of the Glu160Ala mutant strongly suggests that this residue is involved in acid/base catalysis as follows. First, a significant difference in the dependence of k(cat)/K(m) on pH as compared to that seen for the wild-type enzyme was found, as expected for a residue that is involved in acid/base catalysis. The changes, however, were not as simple as those seen in other cases. Second, a dramatic decrease (up to 10(5)-fold) in the catalytic efficiency (k(cat)/K(m)) of the enzyme with a substrate requiring protonic assistance is observed upon such mutation. In contrast, the catalytic efficiency of the enzyme with substrates bearing a good leaving group, not requiring acid catalysis, is only moderately impaired relative to that of the wild-type enzyme (8-fold). Surprisingly, however, the glycosylation step was rate-limiting for all but the most reactive substrates. Last, the addition of azide as a competitive nucleophile resulted in the formation of a beta-xylosyl azide product and increased the k(cat) and K(m) values up to 8-fold while k(cat)/K(m) remained relatively unchanged. Such kinetic behavior is consistent with azide acting competitively with water as a nucleophile in the second step of the enzyme catalyzed reaction involving breakdown of the xylosyl-enzyme intermediate. Together, these results provide strong evidence for a role of Glu160 in acid/base catalysis but suggest that it may be partnered by a second carboxylic acid residue and that the enzyme may function through using acid catalysis involving reverse protonation of active site residues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistrySame topicEnzyme Production and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207