Improvements of electroosmotic consolidation of soft clays by minimizing power loss at electrodes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although it appears promising in many laboratory studies, electroosmotic consolidation of soft clays is seldom used in practical applications. A study of well-documented case records of field applications illustrates the difficulty of transmitting the electrical potential to the soil deposit through the use of electrodes. An important amount of the electrical potential is indeed lost at the soilelectrode contact. The loss of potential at this point has been studied in a laboratory setup designed to reproduce the conditions existing in the field during electroosmotic consolidation. The laboratory results confirm that only about a third of the electrical potential applied at the electrodes is effectively transmitted to the soil and available for electroosmotic consolidation. Moreover, the laboratory studies have shown that a chemical treatment to increase the soil conductivity at the soilelectrode contact can double the electrical potential effectively transmitted to the soil and greatly improve the performance of electroosmotic consolidation.Key words: electroosmosis, soft clays, consolidation, potential loss, electrode treatment, soil improvement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it