Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aging is associated with a progressive decline in skeletal muscle mass and function (sarocopenia). Despite several years of research, controversy exists regarding the manifestations and causes of sarcopenia. In the former respect, whereas a preferential loss of so-called "fast-twitch" muscle fibers occurs in rat models of aging, this appears unlikely in human skeletal muscle. In the latter respect, whereas a decline in physical activity with aging contributes to whole-muscle atrophy, it cannot explain the marked heterogeneity in muscle fiber size seen in aged muscles. Similarly, systemic alterations, such as reduced blood levels of anabolic hormones and nutritional deficits, although involved in modulating the degree of whole-muscle atrophy, cannot explain the observation that only some fibers atrophy and die while most appear unaffected. A further significant question remaining is that if death of some muscle fibers is normal and perhaps advantageous (that is, by removing malfunctioning cells), what is the capacity for muscle fiber regeneration in adult skeletal muscle and can this process be augmented in aging muscles?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it