Titanocene(III) catalyzed homogeneous hydrosilation-hydrogenation of pyridines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The homogeneous catalytic hydrosilation-hydrogenation of pyridines is observed in the presence of Cp2TiMe2 (Cp = η5-C5H5) and CpCp*TiMe2 (Cp* = η5-C5Me5) as catalysts and using PhSiH3 or PhMeSiH2 as the source of Si-H. Under appropriate conditions, and with appropriate ring-substitution, good yields of the N-silyl-dihydropyridine or N-silyltetrahydropyridine products are be obtained. Although complete saturation is not achieved with organosilane alone, carrying out the reaction under moderate H2 pressures can give excellent yields of N-silylpiperidines. Under moderate pressures of H2, [Cp2TiH]2 catalyzes rapid H-D exchange between H2 and the 2- and 6-positions of C5D5N. Under the same conditions, only traces of hydrogenation are observed. This, together with the regioselectivity of 3-picoline hydrosilation-hydrogenation, leads to the conclusion that the key step in the reaction is probably addition of Ti-Si to C=N.Key words: hydrosilation, hydrogenation, pyridines, dimethyltitanocene, catalysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".