MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022649351 · doi:10.1271/bbb.70683

A Real-Time Quantitative PCR Detection Method for Pork, Chicken, Beef, Mutton, and Horseflesh in Foods

2007· article· en· W2022649351 on OpenAlexaff
Soichi Tanabe, Makiko Hase, Takeo Yano, Masahiko Sato, T. Fujimura, Hiroshi Akiyama

Bibliographic record

VenueBioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicIdentification and Quantification in Food
Canadian institutionsConestoga Meat Packers (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTaqManDetection limitMitochondrial DNAMinor grooveCytochrome bFood scienceReal-time polymerase chain reactionBiologyMatrix (chemical analysis)DNAChemistryChromatographyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A rapid real-time quantitative PCR method to detect trace amounts of pork, chicken, beef, mutton, and horseflesh in foods was developed. The primers and TaqMan MGB (minor groove binder) probes were designed on the gene encoding cytochrome b for the specific detection of each species. The limit of quantification of this method was found to be 100 fg/microl of each mitochondrial DNA in 10 ng/microl of the wheat mitochondrial DNA matrix. The calculated R(2) values of the standard curves for the five species ranged between 0.994 and 0.999. This method would be particularly useful in the detection of hidden meat mince in processed foods, which would verify food labeling and gain consumers' trust.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations130
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioscience Biotechnology and BiochemistrySame topicIdentification and Quantification in FoodFrench-language works237,207