MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022679375 · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.190

Multi-scale Foreign Exchange Rates Ensemble for Classification of Trends in Forex Market

2014· article· en· W2022679375 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Computer Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicStock Market Forecasting Methods
Canadian institutionsCTS Forex (Canada)University of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForeign exchange marketComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceForeign exchangeMachine learningNaive Bayes classifierClassifier (UML)Ensemble learningBayesian probabilityExchange rateEconometricsSupport vector machineEconomicsFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Foreign exchange (Forex) market is the largest trading market in the world. Predicting the trend of the market and performing automated trading are important for investors. Recently, machine learning techniques have emerged as a powerful trend to predict foreign exchange (FX) rates. In this paper, we propose a new classification method for identifying up, down, and sideways trends in Forex market foreign exchange rates. A multi-scale feature extraction approached is used for training multiple classifiers for each trend. Bayesian voting is used to find the ensemble of classifiers for each trend. Performance of the system is validated using different metrics. The results show superiority of ensemble classifier over individual ones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it