Repression of the human immunodeficiency virus type‐1 long terminal repeat by the c‐Myc oncoprotein
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of trans-acting factors on cis-acting DNA elements on the HIV-1 promoter are the principal determinant regulating transcriptional activation and repression. Host factors that limit viral replication can contribute to the emergence and maintenance of proviral reservoirs. The current paradigm is that this sub-population of latently infected cells confers a biological advantage to the virus by facilitating evasion of immunologic responses and therapeutic strategies resulting in life-long and persistent infection. In this report, we show that ectopic expression of the nuclear phosphoprotein, c-Myc can inhibit HIV-1 gene expression and virus production in CD4+ T-lymphocytes. The effect exerted does not appear to involve other known functions of c-Myc such as proliferation, or apoptosis. The mechanism does implicate c-Myc in a direct role. We have found evidence that c-Myc can specifically recognize the HIV-1 initiator element surrounding the start site of transcription and linker scanning mutagenesis experiments confirmed a loss of c-Myc-mediated repression in the absence of this region. Moreover, we show that c-Myc can interact with the initiator binding proteins YY-1 and LBP-1 and can cooperate with these factors to synergistically repress HIV-1 LTR transcription. Taken together, these results indicate that c-Myc is an important regulator of HIV-1 transcription that potentially contributes to the latent proviral state.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".