Time-lapse Seismic without Repetition - Reaping the Benefits from Randomized Sampling and Joint Recovery
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary In the current paradigm of 4-D seismic, guaranteeing repeatability in acquisition and processing of the baseline and monitor surveys ranks highest amongst the technical challenges one faces in detecting time-lapse signals. By using recent insights from the field of compressive sensing, we show that the condition of survey repeatability can be relaxed as long as we carry out a sparsity-promoting program that exploits shared information between the baseline and monitor surveys. By inverting for the baseline and monitor survey as the common “background”, we are able to compute high-fidelity 4-D differences from carefully selected synthetic surveys that have different sets of source/receivers missing. This synthetic example is proof of concept of an exciting new approach to randomized 4-D acquisition where time-lapse signal can be computed as long as the survey details, such as source/receiver locations are known afterwards.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it