MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022745069 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2014.7039537

Nash equilibrium seeking by a gossip-based algorithm

2014· article· en· W2022745069 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNash equilibriumGossipComputer scienceBest responseAsynchronous communicationConvergence (economics)Distributed algorithmAlgorithmCorrelated equilibriumGame theoryMathematical optimizationEpsilon-equilibriumGraphSet (abstract data type)Potential gameTheoretical computer scienceEquilibrium selectionMathematicsRepeated gameDistributed computingMathematical economicsComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper an asynchronous gossip-based algorithm is proposed for finding a Nash equilibrium of a game in a distributed multi-player network. The algorithm is designed in such a way that the players' actions are updated based on the estimates of the other players' actions which are obtained from the local neighbors. The almost sure convergence proof of the algorithm to a Nash equilibrium is provided under a set of standard assumptions on the cost functions and the communication graph. The effectiveness of the proposed algorithm is demonstrated via simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.914
Threshold uncertainty score0.760

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDistributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsFrench-language works237,207