MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022776492 · doi:10.1021/ja9002525

Reduced Uranium Complexes: Synthetic and DFT Study of the Role of π Ligation in the Stabilization of Uranium Species in a <i>Formal</i> Low-Valent State

2009· article· en· W2022776492 on OpenAlexaff
Ilia Korobkov, Serge I. Gorelsky, Sandro Gambarotta

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCoordination Chemistry and Organometallics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryUraniumRing (chemistry)Ligand (biochemistry)MetalOxidation stateReagentMedicinal chemistryStereochemistryCrystallographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reaction of UCl(4)(THF)(4) with 1,3-[2,5-(i-Pr)(2)PhNC( horizontal lineCH(2))](2)C(6)H(4)Li(2) produced a complex formulated as [{1,3-[2,5-(i-Pr)(2)PhNC( horizontal lineCH(2))](2)C(6)H(4)}UCl(3)][Li(THF)(4)] (1) that exhibits a nonagostic interaction between one of the carbon atoms of the central phenyl ring and the U metal center. This interaction leads to significant weakening of the corresponding C-H bond, thereby facilitating proton removal in consecutive transformations. Attempts to form trivalent uranium derivatives were carried out by reacting the same ligand dianion with in situ-prepared "UCl(3)". The reaction indeed afforded a trivalent species formulated as {1,3-[2,5-(i-Pr)(2)PhNC( horizontal lineCH(2))](2)C(6)H(4)}U(mu-Cl)(3)[Li(THF)(2)](2) (2). The configuration of the ligand system in this complex is similar to that in 1, with the same type of arrangement of the central phenyl ring. Further reduction chemistry with a variety of reagents and conditions was examined. Reaction of 1 with 1 equiv of lithium naphthalenide at 0 degrees C did not afford 2 but instead gave a closely related U(III) complex formulated as {1,3-[2,5-(i-Pr)(2)PhNC( horizontal lineCH(2))](2)C(6)H(4)}U(THF)(mu-Cl)(2)[Li(Et(2)O)(2)] (3). Both of the trivalent complexes 2 and 3 reacted thermally in boiling THF, undergoing oxidation of the metal center to afford a new tetravalent compound {1,3-[2,5-(i-Pr)(2)PhNC( horizontal lineCH(2))](2)C(6)H(3)}U(THF)(mu-Cl)(2)[Li(THF)(2)] (4) in which the oxidation of the trivalent center occurred at the expense of the central phenyl ring C-H bond. Reaction of 1 with 3 equiv of lithium naphthalenide at room temperature afforded {{1,3-[2,5-(i-Pr)(2)PhNC( horizontal lineCH(2))](2)C(6)H(3)}U(mu-Cl)(mu-[O(CH(2))(3)CH(2)])[Li(DME)]}[Li(DME)(3)] (5). In this species, the tetravalent metal center forms a six-membered metallacycle ring with a moiety arising from THF ring opening. Reaction in DME afforded reductive cleavage of the solvent accompanied by reoxidation of U to the tetravalent state. Reduction of 1 in DME with 2 equiv of potassium naphthalenide at room temperature gave a mixture of two compounds having very similar structures. The two different species [{1,3-[2,5-(i-Pr)(2)PhNC( horizontal lineCH(2))](2)C(6)H(3)}UCl(OCH(3))][Li(DME)(3)] (6a) and [{1,3-[2,5-(i-Pr)(2)PhNC( horizontal lineCH(2))](2)C(6)H(3)}UCl(2)][Li(DME)(3)] (6b) cocrystallized in a ratio very close to 1:1 within the same unit cell. The methoxide group was generated from cleavage of the DME solvent. We also attempted the reduction of 1 with a different reducing agent such as NaH in DME. After a slow reaction, a new species formulated as {1,3-[2,5-(i-Pr)(2)PhNC( horizontal lineCH(2))](2)C(6)H(3)}U(mu-OCH(3))(3)(mu,eta(6)-Na)[eta(3)-Na(DME)] (7) was isolated in significant yield. Once again, the crystal structure revealed the presence of several methoxy groups coordinated to the U center in addition to the metalation of the ligand phenyl ring. To minimize solvent cleavage, reduction of 1 was also carried out at low temperature (-35 degrees C) and with a larger amount (4 equiv) of lithium naphthalenide. After suitable workup, the new species {[{1,3-[2,5-(i-Pr)(2)PhNC( horizontal lineCH(2))](2)C(6)H(3)}U{1,3-[2,5-(i-Pr)(2)PhN horizontal lineC(CH(3))](2)C(6)H(4)}][Li(DME)(THF)]}.Et(2)O (8) was isolated in significant yield. Even in this case, the uranium atom is surrounded by the expected trianionic, ring-metalated ligand. However, a second ligand unit surrounds the metal center, being bonded through a part of the pi system. Reaction of 1 with excess NaH in toluene proceeded slowly at room temperature, affording a significant yield of {[{1,3-[2,5-(i-Pr)(2)PhNC( horizontal lineCH(2))](2)C(6)H(3)}U{1,3-[2,5-(i-Pr)(2)PhN horizontal lineC(CH(3))](2)C(6)H(4)}{Na(DME)(2)}][Na(DME)(3)]}.(1)/(2)C(7)H(8) (9) after crystallization from DME/toluene. Similar to 8, the complex still contains one ring-metalated trianionic ligand and one intact ligand that has regained the H atoms and restored the two imine functions. Although according to their connectivities, complexes 8 and 9 could be assigned with the formal oxidation states +2 and +1, respectively, density functional theory calculations clearly indicated that these species contain additional spin density on the ligand system with the metal center in its more standard trivalent state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.268

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations69
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicCoordination Chemistry and OrganometallicsFrench-language works237,207