MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022784940 · doi:10.1109/epec.2014.41

Optimal Filter Placement and Sizing Using Ant Colony Optimization in Electrical Distribution System

2014· article· en· W2022784940 on OpenAlexaff
Fawaz Masoud Alhaddad, M.E. El-Hawary

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTotal harmonic distortionSizingAnt colony optimization algorithmsAnt colonyHarmonicComputer scienceMathematical optimizationFilter (signal processing)VoltageControl theory (sociology)Electric power systemPower (physics)Distortion (music)Electronic engineeringAlgorithmEngineeringMathematicsElectrical engineeringAcousticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an application of the Ant Colony algorithm for optimizing filter placement and sizing on a radial distribution system to reduce power losses and keep the effective harmonic voltage values and the total harmonic distortion (THD) within prescribed limits. First, a harmonic load flow (HLF) algorithm is performed to demonstrate the effect of harmonic sources on total power loss. Then the Ant Colony algorithm is used in conjunction with HLF to place a selection of filter sizes available at each possible location so that both power loss and THD are minimized. As a result the optimal adjustment of location and size of the filter are determined. Results of computational experiments on standard test systems are presented to demonstrate improvement and effectiveness of using the filters at the optimal location. The methodology used can be easily extended to different distribution network configurations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.701
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Quality and HarmonicsFrench-language works237,207