MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022788486 · doi:10.1142/s0217751x04017124

THE SIMPLEST SUPERSYMMETRY ALGEBRAS IN FLAT TEN- AND ELEVEN-DIMENSIONAL SPACES

2004· article· en· W2022788486 on OpenAlexafffund
D. G. C. McKeon, G. VAN LEEUWEN

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modern Physics A · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSpinorPhysicsBounded functionSupersymmetryDimension (graph theory)Operator (biology)Momentum (technical analysis)Mathematical physicsGenerator (circuit theory)Theoretical physicsPure mathematicsQuantum mechanicsMathematical analysisMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The simplest spinor representations of the Poincaré group in flat ten and eleven dimensions with all possible signatures are considered. The possible superalgebraic extensions of the Poincaré algebra that are consistent with these spinor representations are provided, with the assumption that the only Bosonic operator that does not commute with the Fermionic operators is the generator of rotations. It is shown that the magnitude of the momentum is bounded above by the central charges, except when there is one time dimension, in which case the momentum is bounded below. An argument is made that this latter property is true in all dimensions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Modern Physics ASame topicBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsFrench-language works237,207