Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article expose une réflexion théorique et empirique sur l’engagement des femmes pour l’égalité au sein des Nations Unies. Après avoir présenté brièvement des éléments d’analyse qui visent à mieux saisir les transformations qui ont cours sur la scène internationale, il retrace des moments clés de la prise en compte des droits des femmes aux Nations Unies afin d’illustrer les luttes menées par des femmes, des groupes de femmes et d’autres ONG pour transformer des institutions sexistes, hétérosexistes et racistes. Dans un dernier temps, il commente certains éléments de discours tenus par le Forum des ONG dans le contexte des négociations pour l’adoption d’un Programme d’action par les gouvernements participant à la quatrième Conférence mondiale sur les femmes à Beijing en 1995. En guise de conclusion, quelques éléments qui pourraient contribuer à la fissuration du dispositif de mondialisation capitaliste et conduire à sa transformation sont esquissés.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".