MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022801935 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2011.2179790

Semi-Analytical Modeling of Distributed Phase-Shifts Applied on Chirped Fiber Bragg Gratings

2012· article· en· W2022801935 on OpenAlexafffund
Alexandre D. Simard, Sophie LaRochelle

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersCanada Research ChairsUniversité Laval
KeywordsFiber Bragg gratingOpticsCoupled mode theoryMaterials scienceLong-period fiber gratingGratingOptical filterBandwidth (computing)ResonatorPhysicsOptical fiberRefractive indexFiber optic sensorPolarization-maintaining optical fiberTelecommunicationsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tunable notch filters with multiple transmission lines have been proposed and demonstrated by temporarily inducing phase-shifts in chirped fiber Bragg gratings through the application of stress or thermal perturbations. These filters find application in many fields including microwave photonics or optical communications. So far, study of this type of filter has been mostly experimental with occasional numerical modeling based on coupled-mode theory. This paper presents a theoretical analysis using the WKB approximation that highlightens the presence of resonators and quantitatively describes both the phase-shift accumulated in the propagation region and the reflection strength of the surrounding grating regions. The model provides an approximated function of the transmission peak amplitude that gives good insight into its dependence on the grating parameters and perturbation profile. This analysis predicts the filter bandwidth, tuning capability and minimum spectral separation between two transmission lines leading to straightforward design and optimization of the filter parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score0.836

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lightwave TechnologySame topicAdvanced Fiber Optic SensorsFrench-language works237,207