Impedance Characterization of Anodic Barrier Al Oxide Film Beneath Porous Oxide Layer
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is a common technique used in the assessment of the thickness of anodic oxide films formed on Al and its alloys. However, it is shown here that the resistance values obtained from EIS data are highly dependent on the solution in which the measurements are made, while the capacitance values are independent of the solution conditions and are therefore a much more reliable means of determining oxide film thickness and other properties. We also show that the experimental EIS data for unsealed porous anodic oxides formed on top of a barrier Al oxide film in acidic solutions exhibit only a single time constant, with very little influence seen from the overlying porous oxide layer on the apparent and values. The reason for this is demonstrated by utilizing the Laplace equation to calculate the electric field induced in the oxide, which confirms that the EIS response of these films can generally be assumed to reflect the properties and coverage of the underlying barrier oxide film.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it