MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022823533 · doi:10.1063/1.2819485

Phase behavior of a simple dipolar fluid under shear flow in an electric field

2008· article· en· W2022823533 on OpenAlexfundno aff
J. Liam McWhirter

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCharacterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsShear flowCouette flowDilatantMechanicsShear rateSimple shearShear (geology)Classical mechanicsThermostatElectric fieldDipoleComplex fluidPhysicsChemistryViscosityFlow (mathematics)ThermodynamicsMaterials scienceShear stressQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations are performed on a dense simple dipolar fluid under a planar Couette shear flow. Shear generates heat, which is removed by thermostatting terms added to the equations of motion of the fluid particles. The spatial structure of simple fluids at high shear rates is known to depend strongly on the thermostatting mechanism chosen. Kinetic thermostats are either biased or unbiased: biased thermostats neglect the existence of secondary flows that appear at high shear rates superimposed upon the linear velocity profile of the fluid. Simulations that employ a biased thermostat produce a string phase where particles align in strings with hexagonal symmetry along the direction of the flow. This phase is known to be a simulation artifact of biased thermostatting, and has not been observed by experiments on colloidal suspensions under shear flow. In this paper, we investigate the possibility of using a suitably directed electric field, which is coupled to the dipole moments of the fluid particles, to stabilize the string phase. We explore several thermostatting mechanisms where either the kinetic or configurational fluid degrees of freedom are thermostated. Some of these mechanisms do not yield a string phase, but rather a shear-thickening phase; in this case, we find the influence of the dipolar interactions and external field on the packing structure, and in turn their influence on the shear viscosity at the onset of this shear-thickening regime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicCharacterization and Applications of Magnetic NanoparticlesFrench-language works237,207