MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022842625 · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.117.3.616

Odor tracking in rats with orbital frontal lesions.

2003· article· en· W2022842625 on OpenAlexaff
Douglas G. Wallace, Bryan Kolb, Ian Q. Whishaw

Bibliographic record

VenueBehavioral Neuroscience · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOdorFrontal cortexNeurosciencePsychologyOlfactory system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rats track self-, conspecific, and artificial odors to locate food. The orbital frontal cortex has been implicated in olfactory behavior, but whether it plays a role in a species-typical behavior, such as odor-guided navigation, has not been studied. Rats were trained to track 1 of 3 different odors deposited on a string. After rats were reliably tracking a scented string, they received a series of 2- and 3-odor discrimination tests. Next, all the rats received bilateral aspiration lesions of the orbital frontal cortex and experienced the same sequence of tasks. Rats learned to track and discriminate between different odors reliably. These results suggest that other areas of the brain mediate odor-guided navigation following damage to the orbital frontal cortex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.175
Threshold uncertainty score0.658

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.261
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.071 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBehavioral NeuroscienceSame topicOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesFrench-language works237,207