Quasi-Steady Convergence of Multistep Navier–Stokes Icing Simulations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A newly developed two-dimensional ice accretion and antiicing simulation code, CANICE2D-NS, is presented. The method is used to predict iced airfoil shapes and performance degradation with a multistep approach. A multiblock Navier–Stokes code, NSMB, has been coupled with the CANICE2D icing framework, supplementing the existing panel method-based flow solver. Attention is paid to the roughness implementation within the turbulence model and to the convergence of the steady and quasi-steady iterative procedure. The new coupling allows fully automated multilayer icing simulation, whereas also permitting flow analysis and performance prediction of iced airfoils. Effects of uniform surface roughness in quasi-steady ice accretion simulation are analyzed through different validation test cases. The results demonstrates the benefits and robustness of the new framework in predicting ice shapes and aerodynamic performance parameters, as well as iced airfoil surface pressure coefficients. Finally, the convergence of the quasi-steady algorithm is verified and identifies the need for an order of magnitude increase in the number of multitime steps in icing simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it