MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022864587 · doi:10.7202/706100ar

Régie des populations de Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera : Tortricidea) dans les vergers commerciaux du Québec avec des phéromones de synthèse

2005· article· fr· W2022864587 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Gérald Chouinard, Charles Vincent, Guy Langlais, Michèle Roy

Bibliographic record

VenuePhytoprotection · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect Pheromone Research and Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTortricidaeCodling mothLepidoptera genitaliaBiologyForestryBotanyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Des diffuseurs à phéromones sexuelles de synthèse ont été installés en 1992 et 1993 dans trois vergers de pommiers ( Malus pumila ) du Québec, à raison de 1000 diffuseurs ha lors d'un essai de régie des populations de carpocapse de la pomme, Cydia pomonella [Lepidoptera : Tortricidae]. De 1991 à 1992, soit après un an d'essai, les dégâts de carpocapse à la récolte sont passés de 54 % à 32 %, de 11 % à 2 %, et se sont maintenus à 0 % dans les vergers à forte, moyenne et faible pressions de carpocapse, respectivement. Après deux ans d'essai, les dégâts sont demeurés au même niveau ou ont été diminués davantage selon le type de programme de répression utilisé contre les autres ravageurs. En 1993, une baisse de 75-100 % des captures a aussi été observée dans les pièges à phéromones par rapport aux captures observées en 1991.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.502
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhytoprotectionSame topicInsect Pheromone Research and ControlFrench-language works237,207