MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Single‐center experience with mycophenolate mofetil in pediatric renal transplant recipients

2001· article· en· W2022876245 on OpenAlexaff
Mumtaz Virji, James E. Carter, David S. Lirenman

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Transplantation · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePrednisoneAzathioprineMycophenolic acidTransplantationDaclizumabSurgeryThymoglobulinMycophenolateImmunosuppressionGastroenterologyInternal medicineKidney transplantationTacrolimus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), a potent and specific inhibitor of guanosine nucleotide synthesis, is a new immunosuppressive drug used to prevent rejection in transplant patients. Extensive data on its utility and efficacy exists in adult patients but there is limited experience in pediatrics. Twenty-four children (14 male, 10 female; 2-19 yr of age), eight of whom had received living-related donor (LRD) transplants and 16 of whom had received cadaveric donor (CD) transplants, have been treated with MMF in our institution since September 1996. MMF was administered for a duration ranging from 13 weeks to 38 months, at an average dose of 600 mg/m2 (range: 200-1,000 mg/dose) every 12 h, for a total experience of 304 patient months. MMF capsules were used in 16 patients and/or pediatric suspension in eight. Five patients were switched to MMF from azathioprine as a result of rejection episodes or inability to taper prednisone, between 5 weeks and 3.5 yr post-transplant. All patients received prednisone, cyclosporin A (CsA), and induction therapy with anti-lymphocyte globulin (19 patients), anti-thymocyte globulin (one patient) or daclizumab (four patients). In 12 patients started on MMF at the time of CD transplant, five (42%) had an acute rejection episode. In seven who received a LRD transplant, one (14%) had an acute rejection episode. No patients who were converted to MMF were treated for acute rejection following conversion to MMF. One LRD graft was lost at 19 days following injury to the donor artery at the time of retrieval. At the last follow-up, the average creatinine level was 93 micromol/L and average urea level was 8.6 mmol/L. One patient developed epigastric distress. Three patients developed diarrhea/abdominal pain requiring dose adjustment. Five episodes of leukopenia and one episode of thrombocytopenia required dose adjustment. Two patients developed symptomatic cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, one while on acyclovir prophylaxis. No malignancy has been encountered to date. Hence, MMF can be administered safely to children with good effect and with an acceptable side-effect profile.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric TransplantationSame topicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207