MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022887099 · doi:10.1145/1569901.1570123

MC/DC automatic test input data generation

2009· article· en· W2022887099 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware Testing and Debugging Techniques
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoftware qualityComputer scienceReliability engineeringCode coverageFitness functionSoftwareRandom testingChainingTest suiteTest dataTest caseAlgorithmEngineeringSoftware developmentMachine learningSoftware engineeringGenetic algorithmProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In regulated domain such as aerospace and in safety critical domains, software quality assurance is subject to strict regulation such as the RTCA DO-178B standard. Among other conditions, the DO-178B mandates for the satisfaction of the modified condition/decision coverage (MC/DC) testing criterion for software where failure condition may have catastrophic consequences. MC/DC is a white box testing criterion aiming at proving that all conditions involved in a predicate can influence the predicate value in the desired way. In this paper, we propose a novel fitness function inspired by chaining test data generation to efficiently generate test input data satisfying the MC/DC criterion. Preliminary results show the superiority of the novel fitness function that is able to avoid plateau leading to a behavior close to random test of traditional white box fitness functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware Testing and Debugging TechniquesFrench-language works237,207