Cytotoxic effects of pyocin S2 produced by <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> on the growth of three human cell lines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pyocin typing of 82 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains, collected from different Iranian clinical sources, revealed that one isolate, P. aeruginosa 42A, produced pyocin S2, a protease-sensitive bacteriocin. Pyocin S2 production was induced by mitomycin C (2 micro g/mL) in the pyocin S2 producer P. aeruginosa 42A. Pyocin S2 was purified using ion exchange chromatography with CM-Sepharose CL-6B and sodium phosphate buffer (pH 8) from an 80% ammonium sulfate precipitate of whole-cell lysates. Pyocin activity of the fractions was detected using the Govan spot testing method. The purity of the active fraction was confirmed by SDS-PAGE, where a single band with a molecular mass of 74 kDa was detected. Cytotoxic effects of purified pyocin S2 and partially purified pyocin from P. aeruginosa 42A on the human tumor cell lines HepG2 and Im9 and the normal human cell line HFFF (Human Foetal Foreskin Fibroblast) were studied by the MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay. The results demonstrated that partially purified pyocin and pyocin S2 exhibited substantial inhibitory effects on the growth of the tumor cell lines HepG2 and Im9, while no inhibitory effects were observed on the normal cell line HFFF. Pure lipopolysaccharide was used as a control and was found to have no inhibitory effect on any of the cell lines tested.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".