MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022938358 · doi:10.1080/10739149.2012.673199

ALGAE DETECTION AND SHIP'S BALLAST WATER ANALYSIS BY A MICROFLUIDIC LAB-ON-CHIP DEVICE

2012· article· en· W2022938358 on OpenAlexaff
Yongxin Song, Jizhe Wang, Jiandong Yang, Yanbin Wu, Nan Li, Ning Gong, Xinxiang Pan, Yeqing Sun, Dongqing Li

Bibliographic record

VenueInstrumentation Science & Technology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine Ecology and Invasive Species
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBallastAlgaeLab-on-a-chipChipMicrofluidicsChlorella vulgarisEnvironmental sciencePulp and paper industryMaterials scienceNanotechnologyElectrical engineeringBiologyEngineeringEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article reports a microfluidic lab-on-chip device that can detect algae and analyze ship's ballast water treatment performance according to the standard set by the International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments. A microfluidic differential resistive pulse sensor (RPS) was employed to detect, count, and size two algae of different sizes, a larger alga, Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, and a smaller one, Chlorella vulgaris. The number rate of the algae flowing through the sensing gate per 2 min is a linear function of the sample concentration. A number rate-concentration correlation curve was experimentally obtained and verified, and can be used to determine the algae concentration simply by counting the number of peaks within several minutes. This lab-on-chip device described in this article is sensitive enough to detect the algae killing efficiency by electrolysis treatment to the ballast water. Also, this device can be easily operated by nonprofessionals and thus has great potentials in shipboard on-site testing for port state control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.248
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstrumentation Science & TechnologySame topicMarine Ecology and Invasive SpeciesFrench-language works237,207