MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2022950851 · doi:10.1177/027046760002000505

Energy, Environmental Performance, and the Built Environment

2000· article· en· W2022950851 on OpenAlexaff
Joshua Abush

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Science Technology & Society · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSustainable Building Design and Assessment
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmbodied energySustainabilityEnergy (signal processing)Built environmentEnvironmental economicsEmbodied cognitionEnvironmental resource managementEnergy performanceArchitectural engineeringComputer scienceRisk analysis (engineering)Environmental planningBusinessEnvironmental scienceEngineeringCivil engineeringEconomicsEcologyArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Efforts to attain sustainability vis-à-vis the built environment are hindered because they are often focused away from the real roots of the various problems. This article analyzes the usefulness of embodied energy as an indicator of environmental performance and suggests that it may not be as useful as its proponents make it out to be. Other indicators and levels of analysis are suggested as being more accurate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.851
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Science Technology & SocietySame topicSustainable Building Design and AssessmentFrench-language works237,207