La CECM et la démocratisation du financement scolaire à Montréal (1963-1973)1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au début des années 1960, les dirigeants de la Commission des écoles catholiques de Montréal (CECM) dénoncent le faible développement de leur secteur secondaire qui accuse un important retard sur celui de la Protestant School Board of Greater Montreal (PSBGM). Le mode de répartition inéquitable de la taxe scolaire est perçu comme l’une des principales causes de ce retard qui fait obstacle à la scolarisation des francophones. À l’époque, le montant de la taxe scolaire, prélevée par cotisation sur les propriétés foncières, est réparti entre les écoles publiques d’après la croyance religieuse des propriétaires. En raison du niveau de richesse plus élevé des protestants, la PSBGM est favorisée par ce mode de financement. Cette étude vise à reconstituer les différentes étapes de la campagne de pression de la CECM pour obtenir l’abolition de ce mode de financement scolaire. Elle tend à montrer le caractère indissociable que prennent la question de la démocratisation de l’enseignement secondaire public et celle de la redistribution équitable des ressources financières des commissions scolaires montréalaises.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".