MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023019237 · doi:10.1021/ac101326f

Laminar Flow Effects During Laser-Induced Oxidative Labeling for Protein Structural Studies by Mass Spectrometry

2010· article· en· W2023019237 on OpenAlexafffund
Lars Konermann, Bradley B. Stocks, Tomasz L. Czarny

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsChemistryMass spectrometryLaminar flowOxidative phosphorylationChromatographyFlow (mathematics)BiochemistryMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Laser-induced oxidative labeling of proteins provides insights into biomolecular structures and interactions. In these experiments, the hydroxyl radical ((*)OH) formed by photolysis of H(2)O(2) generates covalent modifications that are detectable by mass spectrometry. Under conditions where individual protein molecules are irradiated only once, the short (*)OH lifetime (approximately 1 micros) ensures that covalent modifications are formed before any oxidation-induced conformational changes take place. This feature implies that the method should be free of structural artifacts. It has been proposed that single-exposure conditions can be achieved by passing the solution through a capillary where successive laser pulses generate a string of irradiated flow segments that are well separated from one another. The current work explores the convection phenomena within the labeling capillary in more detail. The experiments are conducted at Reynolds numbers <<2000, resulting in laminar flow. The associated parabolic velocity profile causes a portion of each irradiated segment to remain in the labeling window during the subsequent laser pulse. Achieving a genuine single-exposure regime is, therefore, not possible. We estimate the fraction of labeled protein formed under laminar flow conditions, as well as the occurrence of multiple exposure events for any combination of experimental parameters (laser spot width, pulse frequency, and solution flow rate). A proper choice of these parameters provides extensive labeling, while keeping multiple exposure events at an acceptably low level. The theoretical framework developed here is supported by experimental data. Overall, this study reaffirms the feasibility of the use of flow devices for meaningful laser-induced oxidative labeling studies. At the same time, we provide a theoretical underpinning of this technique that goes beyond previously suggested plug flow models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical ChemistrySame topicMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207