MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023030072 · doi:10.1021/ma901355u

An Investigation of Free-Radical Copolymerization Propagation Kinetics of Styrene and 2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate

2009· article· en· W2023030072 on OpenAlexaff
Kun Liang, Marco Dossi, Davide Moscatelli, Robin A. Hutchinson

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicCatalysis and Oxidation Reactions
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCopolymerPolymer chemistryMethacrylateGlycidyl methacrylateMonomerKineticsReactivity (psychology)StyreneChemistryPolymerizationRadical polymerizationRadical2-Hydroxyethyl MethacrylateMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Free-radical copolymerization propagation kinetics of styrene (ST) and 2- hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) have been investigated using pulsed laser polymerization (PLP) combined with size exclusion chromatography (SEC) and proton NMR. Monomer reactivity ratios for bulk ST/HEMA copolymerization are r HEMA = 0.49 and r ST = 0.27, with no significant variation with temperature found between 50 and 120 °C. The composition-averaged copolymerization propagation rate coefficient, k p,cop, is well represented by the implicit penultimate unit effect (IPUE) model. The copolymerization kinetics of HEMA with ST is quite similar to that of glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) with ST. A computational study based on quantum chemistry supports the finding that GMA and HEMA are more reactive toward ST radicals compared to alkyl methacrylates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicCatalysis and Oxidation ReactionsFrench-language works237,207