MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023033001 · doi:10.1021/om300751z

Oxidatively Induced Reductive Elimination from a Chromium(III) Bis(aryl) Complex

2012· article· en· W2023033001 on OpenAlexafffund
K. Cory MacLeod, Brian O. Patrick, Kevin M. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganometallics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsChemistryChromiumBimetallic stripReagentMedicinal chemistryArylCrystal structureStereochemistryReductive eliminationCrystallographyOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The previously reported high-spin Cr(II) compounds CpCr(C 6 H 4 CH 2 NMe 2 ) ( 1 ) and CpCr[C(Ph)C(Ph)C 6 H 4 CH 2 NMe 2 ] ( 2 ) were investigated as precursors to CpCr(III) complexes. Single-electron oxidation of 1 was used to prepare CpCr(C 6 H 4 CH 2 NMe 2 )(X) for X = I ( 3 ), OTs ( 4 ), O 2 CPh ( 5 ), OCMe 2 Ph ( 6 ), SPh ( 7 ). Similarly, CpCr[C(Ph)C(Ph)C 6 H 4 CH 2 NMe 2 ](X) for X = I ( 8 ), SPh ( 9 ) were obtained from 2 . Reactions of 4 with PhCH 2 MgCl or Mg(C 6 H 4 Me) 2 reagents gave the Cr(III) benzyl ( 10 ) and p -tolyl ( 11 ) complexes, respectively. The corresponding reaction of 4 with Mg(CH 2 CMe 3 ) 2 led to isolation of 12, a bimetallic complex with a bridging neopentylidene group. While the reaction of 7 or 10 with AgOTs gave Cr(III) tosylate complex 4, the reaction of 11 and AgOTs led to the product of reductive elimination. The structures of 1, 2, 6 – 8, 11, and 12 were elucidated using single-crystal X-ray diffraction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganometallicsSame topicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207