MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023043330 · doi:10.1139/p01-033

Tomographic reconstruction of multiple in-line holograms for multiple scattering in low energy electron holography

2001· article· en· W2023043330 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Mark R. A. Shegelski, Michael Brian Whitwick, R. Holenstein, T. A. Rothwell

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Northern British Columbia
KeywordsHolographyPhysicsElectron holographyScatteringOpticsLine (geometry)Position (finance)Object (grammar)Focus (optics)Electron scatteringEnergy (signal processing)Orientation (vector space)ElectronArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceGeometryNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We generate simulated holograms for low energy electron point source (LEEPS) microscopy. For a given object (atomic cluster) we construct a number of different holograms by varying the position or the orientation of the object relative to the screen. We then compare the three-dimensional structures of the reconstructions obtained from these holograms using methods developed and reported in previous works. In this investigation, we focus on clusters for which multiple scattering must be taken into account. We report results for bcc-type clusters, a spiral configuration, and some random arrangements. We find that the methods employed give vastly improved reconstructions even when multiple scattering is important. PACS No.: 61.14Nm

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2001
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207