Interaction of Thioether Groups at the Open Coordination Sites of Palladium(II) and Platinum(II) Complexes Probed by Luminescence Spectroscopy at Variable Pressure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The crystal structures of [PtCl(2)(ttcn)], [PdCl(2)(ttcn)], [Pt(ethylenediamine)(ttcn)](PF(6))(2), and [Pd(ethylenediamine)(ttcn)](PF(6))(2) (ttcn = 1,4,7-trithiacyclononane) show short apical metal---S(ttcn) distances, qualitatively indicating an interaction. Luminescence spectroscopy was used to study these crystalline complexes at room temperature and variable hydrostatic pressure. The luminescence band maximum of [PdCl(2)(ttcn)] shows a pressure-induced blue shift of +6 cm(-1)/kbar, while the platinum(II) compounds show a red shift of approximately -20 cm(-1)/kbar. This difference is rationalized in terms of a competition between blue shifts due to pressure-induced metal-ligand bond shortening in the equatorial plane and increasing out-of-plane distance of the metal center, and a red shift due to the approach of the apical sulfur donor to the metal center. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations indicate d-d luminescence transitions and a different nature of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) for [PdCl(2)(ttcn)] than for [PtCl(2)(ttcn)], while the lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals (LUMOs) are identical in character. This electronic structure difference is used to rationalize the different pressure effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".