MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023053091 · doi:10.1159/000182186

Growth Hormone and Lipids

2008· review· en· W2023053091 on OpenAlexaff
Ulrich Keller

Bibliographic record

VenueHormone Research · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Nutrition, Metabolism and Diabetes
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNEFAEndocrinologyInternal medicineHormoneAcromegalyVery low-density lipoproteinGrowth hormone deficiencyGrowth hormoneChemistryLipoproteinCholesterolBiologyMedicineInsulin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been known for more than 30 years that growth hormone has a lipolytic properties and growth hormone excess (acromegaly) and growth hormone deficiency have been reported to be associated with abnormalities in serum lipoprotein concentrations. Due to the lipolytic effect of growth hormone, its administration in man has been reported to increase plasma nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA) concentrations. Ketone body production increases during acute growth hormone excess as a result of increased NEFA concentrations; similarly, the increase in serum triglycerides may be explained by an increase in substrate (NEFA) supply to the liver for VLDL production. The effect may be enhanced by a simultaneous decrease of serum lipoprotein lipase activity. The cholesterol-lowering effect of growth hormone administration has not been investigated in detail, specifically, the effect of growth hormone on LDL kinetics is unknown. Growth hormone-excess and growth hormone deficiency have been reported to be associated with increased risk for atherosclerosis; an association with serum lipoprotein changes is likely but evidence for a causal link is yet lacking.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.187
GPT teacher head0.443
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHormone ResearchSame topicDiet and metabolism studiesFrench-language works237,207