MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023053262 · doi:10.3138/tjt.18.2.245

Portraits of Parish Life: Canadian Fiction as a Resource for Historical and Pastoral Studies

2002· article· en· W2023053262 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Sandra Beardsall

Bibliographic record

VenueToronto Journal of Theology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativePoetryPortraitSociologyCriticismResource (disambiguation)ChristianityLiterary criticismLiteratureHistoryAestheticsArtArt historyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study, then, is to promote the use of fictional narrative in pastoral and church history classrooms by offering a sample method for such studies, followed by a brief "tour" of some Canadian fictional congregations. I also hope to encourage further dialogue of the type that occurs at the "Christianity and Literature Study Group," which meets annually at the Congress of Humanities and Social Sciences, bringing theologians and literature scholars together to examine fiction and poetry. The pastoral lens can offer fiction readers yet another angle from which to view their narratives, just as the tools of literary criticism can inform the historical and pastoral enterprise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.641
Threshold uncertainty score0.746

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueToronto Journal of TheologySame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207