MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023062871 · doi:10.1108/ijicc-07-2014-0034

Simultaneous knowledge-based identification and optimization of PHEV fuel economy using hyper-level Pareto-based chaotic Lamarckian immune algorithm, MSBA and fuzzy programming

2015· article· en· W2023062871 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceIdentifierIdentification (biology)Fuzzy logicExploitPareto principleMathematical optimizationArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to probe the potentials of computational intelligence (CI) and bio-inspired computational tools for designing a hybrid framework which can simultaneously design an identifier to capture the underlying knowledge regarding a given plug-in hybrid electric vehicle’s (PHEVs) fuel cost and optimize its fuel consumption rate. Besides, the current investigation aims at elaborating the effectiveness of Pareto-based multiobjective programming for coping with the difficulties associated with such a tedious automotive engineering problem. Design/methodology/approach – The hybrid intelligent tool is implemented in two different levels. The hyper-level algorithm is a Pareto-based memetic algorithm, known as the chaos-enhanced Lamarckian immune algorithm (CLIA), with three different objective functions. As a hyper-level supervisor, CLIA tries to design a fast and accurate identifier which, at the same time, can handle the effects of uncertainty as well as use this identifier to find the optimum design parameters of PHEV for improving the fuel economy. Findings – Based on the conducted numerical simulations, a set of interesting points are inferred. First, it is observed that CI techniques provide us with a comprehensive tool capable of simultaneous identification/optimization of the PHEV operating features. It is concluded that considering fuzzy polynomial programming enables us to not only design a proper identifier but also helps us capturing the undesired effects of uncertainty and measurement noises associated with the collected database. Originality/value – To the best knowledge of the authors, this is the first attempt at implementing a comprehensive hybrid intelligent tool which can use a set of experimental data representing the behavior of PHEVs as the input and yields the optimized values of PHEV design parameters as the output.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.523
Threshold uncertainty score0.811

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it