Pediatric Trauma in Southwestern Ontario: Linking Data with Injury Prevention Initiatives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Our objective was to provide an epidemiologic description of pediatric trauma in SW Ontario using multiple data sets. Injury prevention (IP) initiatives were linked with predominant injury mechanisms to determine whether IP programs were supported by data. METHODS: Descriptive analysis was undertaken for five pediatric age groups (<1 year, 1-4 years, 5-9 years, 10-14 years, 15-19 years) using the Ontario Trauma Registry's Death Data Set, Comprehensive Data Set (Lead Trauma Hospitals [LTH] patients), and Minimal Data Set (hospital admissions), 1999-2000, for all pediatric patients residing in SW Ontario. National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (NACRS) data from the Children's Hospital of Western Ontario/London Health Sciences Centre were used to capture the Emergency Room (ER) injury data. Information on IP initiatives for children and youth was gathered through an Internet search, supplemented by a survey. RESULTS: Injury in SW Ontario resulted in 13,197 ER visits, 1,616 hospital admissions, 70 severe trauma (ISS > 12) cases treated at a LTH and 47 deaths to children and youth. More males than females were injured, with the sex differential more pronounced as age increased. Falls were the leading mechanism for ER visits (37%) and hospital admissions (26%). Recreational injuries represented approximately 30% of injuries to the 10-14 yr age group. As ISS increased, MVCs emerged as an important mechanism, representing 71% of LTH cases and 53% of pediatric injury deaths in SW Ontario. There were 61 pediatric IP programs identified in SW Ontario. Eighty-four percent of programs (51/61) were supported by data, and were related to one of the predominant injury mechanisms. CONCLUSIONS: Injury is a serious problem for children in SW Ontario. Data can be used to identify modifiable risk factors to develop and implement new IP initiatives with the goal of reducing childhood injury and death. There is a need to integrate and link IP programs in SW Ontario for full coverage of all injury mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".