MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

New behavioral-level simulation technique for RF/microwave applications. Part II: Approximation of nonlinear transfer functions

2000· article· en· W2023112027 on OpenAlexaff
Sergey Loyka, J. R. Mosig

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonlinear systemTransfer functionElectronic engineeringRepresentation (politics)MicrowaveComputer scienceSeries (stratigraphy)Filter (signal processing)Noise (video)Electronic circuitControl theory (sociology)AlgorithmEngineeringTelecommunicationsPhysicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The instantaneous quadrature technique is an efficient tool for nonlinear behavioral-level simulation of RF/microwave circuits or systems over wide frequency and dynamic ranges. In order to obtain accurate simulation results, accurate approximation/representation of the nonlinear transfer functions (or factors) as well as accurate measurement (or circuit-level simulation) of the amplitude (AM–AM) and phase (AM–PM) nonlinearities are required. In this paper, we consider how to approximate these transfer functions (factors) using splines, orthogonal and nonorthogonal series expansions, and evolutionary programming techniques (genetic algorithm and neural networks) with viewpoint of the simulation accuracy. The influence of AM–AM and AM–PM measurement (or simulation) inaccuracy and noise on the entire simulation accuracy is also discussed. Series expansion methods are proposed as a tool to filter out the measurement noise. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J RF and Microwave CAE 10: 238–252, 2000.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided EngineeringSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207