MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023134459 · doi:10.2118/165234-pa

Pelican Lake Field: First Successful Application of Polymer Flooding In a Heavy-Oil Reservoir

2014· article· en· W2023134459 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOil in placePetroleum engineeringOil fieldPolymer solutionGeologyPetroleumFlooding (psychology)Enhanced oil recoveryOil productionCompletion (oil and gas wells)Environmental sciencePolymerMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary The Pelican Lake heavy-oil field in northern Alberta (Canada) has had a remarkable history since its discovery in the early 1970s. Initial production by use of vertical wells was poor because of the thin (less than 5 m) reservoir formation and high oil viscosity (800–80,000-plus cp). The field began to reach its full potential with the introduction of horizontal drilling and was one of the first fields worldwide to be developed with horizontal wells. However, with primary recovery at less than 10% and 6.4 billion bbl of oil in place (OIP), the prize for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) is large. Initially, polymer flooding had not been considered as a viable EOR technology for Pelican Lake because of the high viscosity of the oil, until the idea came of combining it with horizontal wells. A first—unsuccessful—pilot was implemented in 1997, but the lessons drawn from that failure were learned and a second pilot was met with success in 2006. The response to polymer injection in this pilot was excellent, with oil rate increasing from 43 BOPD to more than 700 BOPD and remaining high for more than 6 years; the water cut has generally remained at less than 60%. Incremental recovery over primary production is variable but can reach as high as 25% of oil originally in place (OOIP) in places. This paper presents the history of the field and then focuses on the polymer-flooding aspects. It describes the preparation and results of the two polymer-flood pilots, as well as the extension of the flood to the rest of the field (currently in progress). Polymer flooding has generally been applied in light- or medium-gravity oil, and even currently, standard industry-screening criteria limit its use to viscosities up to 150 cp only. Pelican Lake is the first successful application of polymer flooding in much-higher-viscosity oil (more than 1,200 cp), and as such, it opens a new avenue for the development of heavy-oil resources that are not accessible by thermal methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it