Stable Gas-Phase Radical Cations of Dimeric Tryptophan and Tyrosine Derivatives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stable radical cations of dimeric amino acid derivatives of tryptophan and tyrosine were generated by collision-induced dissociation of [Cu(II)(diethylenetriamine)(amino acid derivative)2]*2+. The yields of the dimer radical cations were dependent on both the auxiliary ligand and the tryptophan or tyrosine derivatives used. Amino acid derivatives with an unmodified carboxylic acid group did not generate dimer radical cations. For the amino acid derivatives Ac-Trp-OMe and Ac-Trp-NH2 (Ac is N-acetyl; OMe and NH2 are the methyl ester and amide modifications of the C-terminal carboxylic group), no auxiliary ligand was required for generating the dimer radical cations. Collision-induced dissociation of the [Cu(II)(amino acid derivative)4]*2+ precursor generated the dimer radical cation [(amino acid derivative)2]*+. Stabilizing interactions, most likely involving hydrogen bonding, between the two amino acid derivatives are proposed to account for observation of the dimer radical cations. Dissociation of these ions yields protonated or radical cationic amino acid derivatives; these observations are consistent with the expectation of proton competition between monomeric units, whose proton affinities were calculated using density functional theory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".